Watch & Listen Video Chris Squire Of Yes Meeting Jimi Hendrix

Enjoy the latest videos in youtube about Jimi Hendrix and download them for your mobile in different audio & video formats

Videos Ranking

This video was published on 2009-07-20 by empsfm @ YouTube

Video details: chris squire of yes talks about meting jimi hendrix, how an acidental biling alowed him to play in front of some of the bigest names in music. part of the emp sfm oral history live! series, yes was interviewed live in jbl theater by emp sfm curator j.. (cont)

The video starts to play automatically
Press the button 360p/480p to watch in High Quality definition (if available)

Click here to comment about Jimi Hendrix!

Add this video in your Web Site

More Jimi Hendrix

More Music Oldies

Listen Jimi Hendrix MP3

(cont) acob mcmuray.

Download Chris Squire Of Yes Meeting Jimi Hendrix

Video Formats:

Audio Formats:

Mobile Device Formats:

Download Jimi Hendrix Videos for free - Music Song Lyrics & MP3

Jimi hendrix killing floor music video

jimi hendrix killing floor jimi jimi jimi jimi hendrix hendrix je

Castles made of sand jimi hendrix

one of jimi hendrix's masterpieces thanks for watching my "music

Are you experienced jimi hendrix

a music montage set to "are you experienced " by jimi hendrix a

Jimi hendrix third stone from the sun

en wikipedia org third stone from the sun is a song written and o

Jimi hendrix rainy day dream away still raining still d

this is my re edited version of the two songs the two songs origi

Freemasons murdered jimi hendrix

freemasons and the illuminati is 2 very sinister organisations t

Watch more Jimi Hendrix videos

Users Comments

17Bayberry: really nice story nice ending to it also : thanks empsfm
l337man4: krang07 i know what you mean. he seems like a really cool guy to just sit around and talk with	Elohim9120: yes is yes forever...
conor30000: that is a perfect story, told perfectly.	krang07: we all love chris just a regular guy that happens to be a huge rock star he seems real personable.
daubreyjaneweirdsley: pencilcollectionpost hendrix was the john coltrane of the electric guitar as miles davis recognised and had he lived to quote davis "he would've been a giant of jazz". none of the guitar players that came after him could match either his technical ability, sonic invention or the impact he had on the culture. ask every name guitarist over the last 40 yrs.your comments are laughable. you obviously don't understand the distinction between a great artist a technician. stick to playground music.	rosskolnikov: he looks pickled . . .
freegie27: pencilcollectionpost honest, fair answer music's subjective, though from an objective viewpoint, as you alluded to, there's no disputing jimi's influence in changing rock guitar or the jaw dropping effect he had on his contemporaries satriani. vai, malmsteen have all paid tribute to the guy technical give a shredder a 60's set up and they'd be stuffed. i sound like a guitar wiz with modern gear i can only imagine how different rock or rock guitar would be without him. peace jmh 1	quidnick: lol i would like to see eric clapton's reaction 'oh my god, i'm not god anymore...'
pencilcollectionpost: diemutha666 i know it was a lot harder back then with equipment and technology etc. i don't dispute his songs were close to his heart, and i know he didn't chose to be number 1. i've never denied his impact on generations of musicians either. however, i've never been that impressed with his playing singing or songwriting and i much prefer the music of those that came after him with greater technical ability and songwriting skills, even if they were heavily infulenced by jimi.	kidzsanlorenzo: this is a great rock story love it
gilocho: malmsteen loves hendrix	diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost i was not into hendrix til my late 20s but it was through constant reading of articles from musicians and producers that worked very closely with jimi or close friends of his, that i finally understood the significance of the songs he wrote, how close they were to his heart and how far ahead he was in his time,considering this was in the 50's and 60's.and all this before i actually listened to his music.maybe you will get it someday,maybe you won't but that's your right.
diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost just their know how and crappy equipment which they had to lug around everywhere.and how ingenious these guys were at their creative ways to get their sounds.pick up a book sometime to widen your horizon about music and musicians from the past .it prevents you from being left in the dark and educates you about how far music has come.as for jimi being overrated,he didn't choose to be 1 but you can see for yourself the impact he had on many musicians,even great ones.	diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost not everyone is a hendrix fan...even me when i was into 70's rock as a kid and then to thrash metal in the early 80's.but it's through these musicians that i learned about their influences and as i got older and wiser,i turned to understand what made them greats.through reading only then did i picture the era as it was and how difficult it was for them as they struggled to be heard with such a pool of talent back in the day.no distortions,no fancy recording equipment.
diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost so in short,it is your musical taste that differs.and to top it all off,in the 60's,technology was almost non existent to musicians unlike today where technology abounds in every variety but the sounds of yesteryear's what many musicians crave for today,depending on the music they play.	diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost pencilcollectionpost well,jimi did what he did his own way.he was not trying to 2 be a musical genius,he was just enjoying what he did.as for malmsteen,he is a blackmore wannabe.deep purple was the first rock band that wrote a concerto for the royal philharmonic orchestra and jammed with them.and of course you would find him a more interesting player...his music and jimi's are world's apart.
pencilcollectionpost: diemutha666 likewise, i do enjoy a good music debate. unfortunatly most of the clowns on here prefer the "@!# off ur a if u dnt agree wiv me " style of debate. so it's nice to have a mature conversation with a seemly well educated man on the subject	pencilcollectionpost: diemutha666 i'm perhaps not as clued up as i could be, but i'm not a guitar player i'm a bass player , but i've always been impressed by amazing musicianship, what ever instrument is being played. hendrix never wrote or played a song that i've enjoyed listning to, however and i've always found him to very overated. but, i have nothing but respect for him for what he started. he layed the foundation, but it was those who came after him who built the house
pencilcollectionpost: diemutha666 sorry for bringing up malmsteen, but i just thought he'd be the most obvious example. again, i disagree that all he does in fly up and down the fretboard, his earlier work esspecially was full of emotion and passion as well as disgustingly good technical ability. his orchestral stuff also i find amazing. i've always found his music a lot more intresting and exciting than jimi's.	diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost these guys were technical in their own way.they actually dismantled their equipments,toyed with it in order to create their own sound.they knew what they were doing even when they didn't.they did it without a manual through trial and error,found what they were looking for and thanks to them,we now have books on "how to tear down your amp guitars,put it together again still sound great" without any fear thanks to the old guard.
diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost it's not all about listening 2 their recordings judging it from there,u have 2 read their stories through books understand what they did 4 music then u can appreciate what these people have done how we are lucky 2 be in a generation that has spawned so many different styles of guitar players due 2 these elite bunch.	diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost after jimi,many guitarists developed their own styles,for example allan holdsworth,blackmore,van halen etc.all groundbreaking in their own way even chuck berry is an influence.as for blackmore,he brought classical touches into rock guitar in the days when every other guitarist was heavily blues influenced.uli roth gets an honorable mention as well.
diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost of course guitarists would evolve in time.no one thought it would happen in the 60s that future generations would be playing faster or developing guitar playing to a different level.different times,different styles.like i said in my first post,jimi is inferior to todays guitarists in terms of technical ability but every guitarist can thank their lucky stars that jimi broke boundaries allowed a generation to dream that they too could bring guitar playing to higher ground.	diemutha666: pencilcollectionpost i knew malmsteen would come into the picture but seriously,malmsteen does not know anything else but to steamroll through the fretboard.i have been listening to him since i was a teen i'm 38 and my dropped at the time due to his speed but it got old and stale after knowing his songs were crappy,cheesy and guitar playing headed only to one direction.he is influenced by blackmore and he even stole his identity and classic blackmore poses.